All of Erica Herman’s allegations against Tiger Wood in $30 million lawsuit explained

Tiger Wood’s ex-girlfriend Erica Herman claimed in her lawsuit that the former World Number One Woods sexually abused her including many other allegations. 

Erica Herman, 39, alleged in the lawsuit that she was forced to sign the non-disclosure agreement (NDA) which she is trying to void. 

Herman made the startling allegation in a suit against Wood of sexual abuse without giving any detail as to what the alleged abuse entailed. 

Also Read | Jim Boeheim: age, net worth, wife Juli Boeheim, children Buddy, Jimmy, Elizabeth, Syracuse Orange stats

In another court filing, Herman is suing Woods for $30 million for ‘severe’ emotional damage, after he tricked her into leaving the Florida mansion where they had lived together for six years, reported DailyMail.com.

Wood’s ex also claimed that his representatives removed $40,000 of her money and made ‘scurrilous and defamatory allegations’ about how she got the money. 

Now, she is demanding more than $ 30 million for what she claims are ‘breaches of duty’ that left her suffering ‘severe’ emotional damages.

Also Read | Who is Jaimee Grubbs, Tiger Woods’ alleged mistress?

According to Herman, she should have been allowed to live in the home in Hobe Sound, Florida, for the coming five years but Woods used ‘trickery’ after breaking up with her in October. 

Herman also sued Tiger’s trust, the Jupiter Island Irrevocable Homestead Trust. It is because trust is the legal owner of his Hobe Sound mansion where the two lived together for six years. 

She also said that she provided ‘valuable services’ at Woods’s requests as part of an ‘oral tenancy agreement,’ that gave her the right to live in the property for a ‘certain duration of time.’

Also Read | What is Speak Out Act? Erica Herman files lawsuit against Tiger Woods citing federal act

The lawsuit, filed as a trust litigation stated “All expenses that related to (Herman’s) residency were fully paid by the defendant or its privies. This agreement was fully performed for the six-year period prior to the events giving rise to this lawsuit.

‘The duties that were performed by the plaintiff were extensive and of an extraordinary nature in light of the overall circumstances and environment in which she lived.’