Hong Kong prison wrong to cut ‘Long Hair’ locks: court

Hong Kong prison staff were wrong to cut off the locks of
veteran dissident “Long Hair”, the city’s top court said Friday, in
the second significant ruling against authorities this month.

The decision comes as pro-establishment voices call for an
overhaul of the judiciary — something opponents fear could muzzle the Hong
Kong legal system’s vaunted independence as Beijing cracks down on critics.

The ruling by the Final Court of Appeal is the culmination
of a long legal battle by Leung Kwok-hung, 64, who served a brief jail sentence
in 2014 linked to his protesting.

Better known by the sobriquet “Long Hair”, he is
one of the city’s veteran dissidents, beginning his career campaigning against
British colonial rule and later becoming a fierce critic of Beijing.

A panel of top judges unanimously ruled that Leung’s rights
had been breached under sexual discrimination laws when his hair was cut in
jail.

Hong Kong prison authorities insist all male inmates keep
their hair cut short, but female convicts are allowed to keep theirs long if
they wish.

“The fact that male prisoners are denied a choice as to
their hair length, suggests that they are treated less favourably than female
prisoners,” the judges wrote, adding authorities had failed to explain why
short hair was required for custodial discipline.

The decision comes at a sensitive time for Hong Kong’s
judges.

Unlike China’s party-controlled judiciary, the city
maintains an independent common law system that forms the bedrock of its
success as a global trade and finance hub.

But two leading pro-Beijing newspapers in the city — and
some prominent pro-government politicians — have recently begun calling for
judicial reforms.

Beijing loyalists have been incensed by recent acquittals of
some protesters and judicial reviews that have gone against the government.

Last week, a High Court judge delivered a damning ruling
against police in a case linked to last year’s huge and often violent
pro-democracy protests.

The judgement found that officers were wrong to hide their
identification badges and that the city’s watchdog has been
“inadequate” in investigating complaints against officers.

One pro-Beijing newspaper ran a scathing report on the
ruling under the headline “Thugs rule, no human rights for
policemen”.

Since last year’s massive protests, Beijing has imposed a
sweeping national security law on the financial hub.

Britain has said it was considering whether to review
allowing its judges to sit on Hong Kong’s highest court over concerns China is
trampling on the city’s freedoms.