The Bombay High Court has allowed Bollywood actor Kangana Ranaut to add Sanjay
Raut, Shiv Sena’s chief spokesperson, as a party in her plea against the
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) over the demolition of a part of her
bungalow in Mumbai.

A bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and R I Chagla also permitted Kangana
to add Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation H-ward’s designated officer Bhagyavant
Late as a party to let him respond to any personal allegations that the actress
makes against him.

On September 9, the ‘Queen’ actor filed a plea in the high court seeking
that the court to declare the demolition of a part of her bungalow in Pali Hill
area in Mumbai by the BMC as illegal.

She subsequently amended her plea to demand Rs two crore as damages from
the civic body and its officials for the demolition.

While hearing her amended plea on Tuesday, the high court noted that
Ranaut‘s counsel, senior advocate Birendra Saraf, had submitted a DVD
containing a speech in which Sena leader Raut allegedly made a comment
threatening the actress.

Justice Kathawalla pointed out that if the actress was going to rely on
the DVD, then Raut will have to be given a chance to respond.

“What if he (Raut) says that he has not made these statements or
that this DVD is fabricated? You have to give him an opportunity to
respond,” the bench said.

Saraf then said he also wanted to make Bhagyavant Late a party in the
plea as the civic official had issued all communications related to the illegal
construction notice and demolition.

On September 9, the BMC demolished a part of Ranaut’s bungalow, alleging
she had made illegal structural changes and repairs to the structure breaching
the civic body’s sanction plan.

The bench led by Justice Kathawalla on the same day stayed the
demolition, saying it appeared to be malafide.

Ranaut filed a rejoinder affidavit in the high court on Monday, stating
that she didn’t make any structural changes or repairs illegally.

She also denied the BMC’s allegation that her demand for the demolition
to be declared illegal and that she be paid Rs 2 crore in damage by the civic
body was an abuse of the process of law.

The actress alleged that the BMC had acted out of personal vendetta
against her after she made some comments against the Shiv Sena-led government
in Maharashtra.

In her rejoinder affidavit, she claimed that on the day she had been
served a notice by the BMC on the alleged illegal construction, several other property
owners in the vicinity of her property, including fashion designer Manish
Malhotra, were served similar notices.

While Malhotra and the others were granted seven days to respond, she
was given just 24 hours.

Her reply was rejected and the demolition carried out.

On Tuesday, the bench said the BMC must clarify when Malhotra and others
named in Ranaut’s affidavit were served with the illegal construction notices,
and if any of those structures have been demolished yet.

The bench also said on the next date, both parties will have to argue on
the amount of time that should have been given to Ranaut to respond to the
BMC’s demolition notice issued under section 354 (A) of the Municipal
Corporation Act.

The court also directed the BMC to file its response to Ranaut’s
rejoinder affidavit by Thursday.

The direction came after BMC’s lawyer, senior counsel Aspi Chinoy, said
Ranaut had made some new statements in her affidavit.

He said while earlier Ranaut maintained that the alleged structural
changes had been made some years ago in consonance with the BMC’s sanction
plan, in her affidavit she had outrightly denied having made any structural
changes to her bungalow.

Ranaut in her rejoinder affidavit said, “I deny that I have carried
out unlawful additions and alterations as alleged or at all.” Last week,
the BMC, through its counsel Joel Carlos, filed an affidavit responding to
Ranaut’s petition.

It said the actress had made major structural changes to the building
without the civic body’s approvals. Therefore, its officials were merely
following the rule of law in demolishing these alterations on September 9.

The civic body had urged the high court to dismiss Ranaut’s plea and
impose a cost upon her for filing the petition, which it said was an
“abuse” of the process of law.

The high court is likely to further hear the matter on Wednesday.