Who is Joel Pollak? Breitbart editor advocates for genocide in Gaza

Joel Pollak, senior editor at Breitbart News, has stirred a maelstrom of controversy by advocating for the genocide of Gaza. Breaking religious traditions, Pollak’s inflammatory statements have ignited a fierce debate about the responsibilities of media figures and the ethical boundaries that must be upheld in journalism.

Joel Pollak recently took to Twitter, breaking the Sabbath to deliver a message that transcends political discourse: “Israel should wipe out Gaza. Allow 48 hours to evacuate women, children, and the elderly. Destroy everything that remains, plow it under, and annex it to Israel. This is the end for Hamas and Palestinian terror.”

The gravity of these words has triggered widespread condemnation and raised urgent questions about the intersection of personal beliefs and journalistic responsibility.

Also Read: Who is Gretchen Felker-Martin? Trans author calls 9/11 Twin Tower attack ‘principled’

Who is Joel Pollak?

Joel Barry Pollak, born in South Africa in 1977, currently serves as the senior editor-at-large for Breitbart News. Initially a politically liberal figure, his views shifted right after experiences in South Africa. Pollak entered the political arena as the Republican nominee for U.S. Congress in 2010 but was unsuccessful. After his political venture, he joined Breitbart News, eventually becoming its editor-in-chief.

Pollak’s tenure at Breitbart has not been without controversy. Notably, during an incident involving reporter Michelle Fields’s alleged assault by Corey Lewandowski, Pollak’s handling of the situation led to resignations and questions about the site’s support for Donald Trump. These incidents provide context to Pollak’s role and influence within the media organization.

Aslo Read: What is Blood Tribe? Neo-Nazi group in Wisconsin demonstrates antisemitic rally

Pollak’s recent call for the genocide of Gaza has sparked ethical concerns regarding journalistic responsibility and the boundaries between personal beliefs and professional duties. Such advocacy, especially from a senior figure in a major media outlet, raises questions about the potential influence on public opinion and the responsibilities that come with holding such a position.