In the ongoing legal battle surrounding former President Donald Trump’s alleged involvement in the 2020 presidential election, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan addressed the issue of a proposed protective order during a federal court hearing in Washington.

Chutkan indicated her willingness to accept a protective order presented by Trump’s legal team that imposes narrower restrictions on evidence disclosure compared to what prosecutors had requested.

The contentious protective order debate centered on defining which evidence should be kept from public view. While prosecutors sought to restrict the dissemination of all evidence turned over to Trump’s lawyers, Chutkan aligned with Trump’s legal team’s stance that only “sensitive” information should be protected.

Also Read: Why are Donald Trump’s supporters asking him to ditch GOP Debate?

The central point of contention was recordings, transcripts, and reports of witness testimony, which prosecutors argued should be treated as “sensitive” information. The protective order issue arises as the case unfolds, focusing on allegations of Trump’s efforts to interfere with the transfer of presidential power.

Chutkan acknowledged Trump’s First Amendment rights but underscored that these rights are not absolute, emphasizing his obligation to comply with the conditions set during his arraignment, including refraining from witness intimidation.

The overarching concern is the potential for inflammatory statements that could impact the fairness of the trial. Prosecutors expressed their intent to prevent improper dissemination of evidence, highlighting Trump’s social media post that vowed to retaliate against those who pursue him.

Trump’s lawyers countered that the proposed order sought to curtail his First Amendment rights and that genuinely sensitive materials should be the sole focus of protection. They claimed the order proposed by prosecutors would hinder his political rights and campaign efforts.

Also Read: Who is Tanya S Chutkan? Judge assigned to Trump’s January 6 indictment case

The legal dispute reflects a larger debate over the appropriate limits of evidence disclosure in high-profile cases involving public figures. The trial’s scheduled start date and protective order resolution remain key elements in the ongoing legal proceedings.