Critics ripped gun control group Moms Demand Action for a social media post claiming that Kyle Rittenhouse “was not held accountable” for killing two men and injuring another with his AR-15 rifle during a Black Lives Matter riot in 2020.

Even though a Wisconsin circuit judge ruled in 2021 that Rittenhouse was not guilty of all charges relating to the deaths of the two men and the injury of the other, Moms Demand Action claimed justice hadn’t been done in post on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Friday, which marked the three-year anniversary of the incident that happened during the riot in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Also Read: Memphis Shooting: One dead, another person injured after gunshots fired at Z-Market in Parkway Village

Rittenhouse’s defenders slammed the post for ignoring that Rittenhouse had been through a highly publicized trial and judged as acting in self-defense against his attackers that day.

Who is Kyle Rittenhouse?

Kyle Rittenhouse is a young individual who gained significant attention due to his involvement in a high-profile legal case in 2020. Born on January 3, 2002, Rittenhouse was 17 years old at the time of the incident. He became the center of a controversy stemming from his participation in the protests that followed the shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man, by a police officer in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

On August 25, 2020, amidst the protests, Rittenhouse, armed with an AR-15 style rifle, inserted himself into the volatile situation. He allegedly shot and killed two individuals, Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, and injured a third, Gaige Grosskreutz. Rittenhouse claimed self-defense, asserting that he believed his life was in danger during the confrontations.

The case sparked intense debates surrounding self-defense laws, vigilantism, and the broader issues of racial injustice and gun control in the United States. Rittenhouse’s actions polarized public opinion, with some viewing him as a misguided vigilante and others as a hero protecting businesses from potential harm.

In November 2021, Rittenhouse faced trial on charges including intentional homicide, attempted intentional homicide, and reckless endangerment. The trial further amplified discussions about self-defense, the right to bear arms, and the role of citizens in responding to civil unrest.

Also Read: Who is Pete Robles? Texas father arrested after gun was found inside 3-year-old’s bag

The trial concluded with Rittenhouse being acquitted on all charges in November 2021. The verdict fueled additional debates and discussions, with some praising the decision as a just application of self-defense laws and others criticizing it as emblematic of systemic issues.

The Kyle Rittenhouse case exemplifies the complexities of legal, social, and political issues in the United States, including questions about the limits of self-defense, the role of individuals in volatile situations, and the broader implications for public safety and justice.