Amid renewed calls for his resignation, US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas faces scrutiny over undisclosed gifts and luxury travel from wealthy benefactors, with Democrats demanding accountability and adherence to ethical standards.

Democratic lawmakers argue that Thomas should step down due to alleged corruption involving undisclosed gifts and extravagant vacations from influential right-wing billionaires, potentially violating disclosure requirements.

ProPublica’s investigation reveals previously unknown connections between Thomas and wealthy donors, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and calls for stricter ethical regulations for Supreme Court justices.

Also Read: Who is Dr. Tracey St. Julian? Georgia doctor sued for alleged baby decapitation during birth

While Thomas remains a prominent conservative justice, critics argue that his acceptance of gifts compromises the integrity of the court and raises questions about impartiality in his decisions.

Democratic lawmakers, including Representatives Bill Pascrell, Gerry Connolly, and Ted Lieu, assert that Thomas’ actions undermine the credibility of the court and warrant his resignation, with some even suggesting impeachment.

Several proposals in Congress aim to enforce ethical standards and a binding code of conduct for Supreme Court justices, sparking debate between Republicans and Democrats over the need for such reforms.

Republican lawmakers argue that calls for ethics reform are politically motivated and aimed at undermining the court’s conservative majority.

Despite renewed scrutiny, impeachment remains unlikely, given the historical rarity of such proceedings against Supreme Court justices.

Also Read: From yacht trip around the Bahamas to stay at luxury resort in Jamaica: Justice Clarence Thomas accepted trips worth millions since 1991: Report

Is Clarence Thomas Republican or Democrat?

Clarence Thomas is generally considered to hold conservative views and has been appointed to the United States Supreme Court by Republican presidents. However, his personal party affiliation is not explicitly stated or widely known.